Dialysis world news

Saving pets through dialysis - Philly.com
Posted: Sunday, March 22, 2015, 3:50 AM

Deathly ill, Harley was marinating in his own toxins. The 4-year-old cat's kidneys had stopped performing their vital blood-cleansing function.

The orange tabby from Jordan - his owner was a diplomat in Washington - was carried into the dialysis suite limp, eyes half-closed and glazed over. The veterinarians and other staff at the University of Pennsylvania were already masked and gloved. They hooked Harley up.

Penn's Matthew J. Ryan Veterinary Hospital is one of a dozen dialysis centers nationally (four are on the East Coast) and the closest to Washington.

Short-term, life-saving hemodialysis is pretty much the same in cats and dogs as it is in people, but on a smaller scale. The kidneys have failed due to blockages, poisons, infections, or diseases; tubes carry blood laden with toxins to a machine that filters it and sends it back into the body.

Most human patients are long-term, in chronic renal failure, requiring dialysis a few times a week for life. For pets, it is only a temporary fix: typically six to eight sessions over a couple of weeks, an attempt to buy time so the kidneys have a chance to heal.

Even so, the odds are not great.

"On average," said J.D. Foster, the veterinarian who heads Penn's program, "we save about half of those patients who would be dead without our work."

Half the survivors will require medications and special diets, often for years. They also will have cost their owners about $750 a session - $5,000 to $7,000 by the time they are done. The 1 percent to 2 percent of owners who have pet insurance will discover reimbursements are capped at far less.

Not that the money matters, at least to those who can afford it.

Foster recalls his youngest patient, an 11-week-old Norwich terrier named Manny. His kidneys and liver ravaged last year by the lethal bacterial infection leptospirosis, he arrived "a gelatinous blob." The soft-spoken, professorial vet smiles as he displays Manny's first-birthday picture - complete with party hat - on his phone.

Then there was Yum Yum. Though she had won best of breed at the 2013 and 2014 Westminster Kennel Club Dog Shows, the bull terrier was not so lucky in health. Dialysis couldn't pull her out of acute kidney failure last fall; she succumbed after five treatments.

Harley, the Middle Eastern tabby, came in a few weeks earlier. Things looked bleak as he awaited his third dialysis hookup. It had been two days since his last treatment, and his dying kidneys hadn't produced urine in nearly a week. Over the next several hours, his blood was flushed through the machine almost 40 times. By the second hour, he had regained enough vigor to try to push off his oxygen mask.

Meanwhile, he snoozed, face settled onto the furry, stuffed green snake placed before him by Holly Brooks, a veterinary student.

"He loves to rest his chin on things," she said.

Another thing Harley seems to love is the taste of lilies. Especially popular in the spring, lilies are the bedrock of mixed floral arrangements, and are common as indoor potted plants and in outdoor gardens.

Cats will readily ingest lilies, which contain toxins that demolish their kidneys. Even a nibble can cause death within three to five days. Owners may not even have noticed their flowers were disturbed.

"We've seen sick cats come in with just the pollen on their faces," said Foster, whose clinic's walls, next to the hospital's intensive-care unit, are festooned with photos from grateful owners.

There is no test for lily toxicity and often no proof of what was involved. Harley, for example, was living in a hotel where lilies - or other poisons - could have come in and out on a cleaning cart.

The cause didn't matter. After Harley spent a few days vomiting, sluggish, and refusing to eat, his vet ran blood tests and found his kidneys were not working. He sent him to Penn.

Dialysis actually began in dogs, experimentally, in 1913. Although the goal was to treat people, that didn't happen for several decades. Dogs were forgotten.

Veterinarian Larry Cowgill is credited with expanding the procedure back to animals in the early 1970s, during his residency at Penn Vet.

The only machines were for humans. "We had pieces of junk," Cowgill recalled, "that we put together as a Rube Goldberg experiment."

He moved to the University of California, Davis, where he developed the world's first veterinary dialysis program in 1990. Then Foster, after graduating from Penn Vet, trained in hemodialysis at UC-Davis and brought it back to Penn in late 2012.

Cats make up nearly 70 percent of cases here (nationally, they are evenly split with dogs). The imbalance is because Penn is the only veterinary hospital in the U.S. with active programs in both dialysis and feline kidney transplantation.

The transplant program started in 1998, after surgeon Lillian R. Aronson arrived, also from UC-Davis; 151 cats have received kidney transplants since then.

The separate dialysis program has given 180 treatments to 48 dogs and cats in 21/2 years. The addition of another machine in October allows two patients to be dialyzed at the same time.

In some poisoning cases, it can be a once-and-done fix.

That's what happened with Penn's first patient, a 16-month-old German shepherd named Sophie. Contractors working on Valarie Hiscock's home in Wynnewood saw Sophie lap up what probably was water laced with antifreeze.

Hiscock got her to the Ardmore Animal Hospital in 20 minutes. Her stomach was pumped, and she was sent on to Penn, where her blood was purged of any toxin that might have been absorbed.

"She is a healthy dog!" Hiscock said last week.

Penn has used dialysis to treat poisonings ranging from grapes and Aleve (both in dogs) to chemotherapy overdoses (in cats).

"Toxicities are wonderful," said Foster, "because we can filter out in a few hours what would normally take the body three days to get rid of."

He vividly recalls Holden, a Rottweiler mix that arrived comatose last year after swallowing an entire bottle of ibuprofen. He awoke during dialysis and was able to walk back to his cage on his own.

Harley did not make the trip from Washington soon enough for that. He needed 10 dialysis sessions over four weeks, but eventually, his kidneys took over, and he even got off most of his meds. Five months later, he seems to be thriving.

"He may never return to completely normal [kidney] function," said Robert Justin, his vet in Leesburg, Va., where Harley gets regular blood work. "Time will tell if he continues to recover."


Joan Capuzzi is a small-animal veterinarian in the Philadelphia area. This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .


Campaign conducted to highlight renal issues - Saudi Gazette

Sorry.. the page you were trying to access is experiencing some difficulties. Please try again.


Improvement in renal function and its impact on survival in patients with ... - Nature.com
Top of page


The current IMWG definition of MM-related RI requires a serum creatinine of 2?g/dl or higher that is unexplainable by any other etiology.25 However, this cutoff may fall short in identifying all NDMM patients with RI since the serum creatinine can be influenced by factors such as muscle mass. Conversely, a cutoff of CrCl <60?ml/min may inappropriately consider older NDMM patients with age-related decline in their CrCl as having MM-related RI. In this study, we used a CrCl cutoff of <40?ml/min as it has appeared to be optimal in identifying NDMM patients with RI when compared to the previously mentioned cutoffs.26

By using our CrCl cutoff of 40?ml/ml, RI at diagnosis was present in almost 20% of the patients. Of these patients, more than half of them (54%) had reversal of their RI upon institution of anti-myeloma induction therapy. This study demonstrated an improvement in survival among NDMM patients with RI as a result of novel agent therapy as seen in Figure 2. Furthermore this study suggests that though RI in NDMM patients is associated with a worse OS as well as higher rates of early mortality, it is not an independent predictor of worse OS as seen in the multivariable model (Table 2). However, this study demonstrates that even if NDMM patients with RI experience a resolution of their RI upon receiving myeloma directed therapy (group 2), they do not have equivalent survival outcomes to those NDMM patients without RI (group 1) as seen in Figure 3a. Furthermore, even after accounting for early mortality by performing a landmark analysis at 6 months, patients in group 2 still do not have equivalent survival outcomes as those patients in group 1 (Figure 2). However, reversal of RI is still important to achieve in NDMM patients. This is because patients in group 3 who have RI at diagnosis but never recover their renal function have a worse median OS to patients in group 2 (33 vs 56 months, P=0.006). This survival benefit of reversal of RI seen in group 2 is observed likely due to their significantly lower rate of early mortality in comparison to group 3 (8 vs 17%; P=0.004). When a landmark analysis was performed at 6 months, the median OS for patients in group 2 compared to group 3 was 67 vs 51 months (P=0.175).

Our study also evaluated the renal function of all the patients at their last follow-up. We observed that even though patients in group 2 had a reversal of their RI, they were more likely to eventually re-worsen their renal function and experience RI again compared to the patients in group 1 (34 vs 9%; P<0.001); this suggests that NDMM patients with RI at diagnosis likely have a higher propensity for RI during their disease course compared to their NDMM counterparts who do not have RI at diagnosis.

Several studies have confirmed the beneficial effect of novel agent induction therapy in NDMM patients with RI in comparison to conventional chemotherapy.27, 28 This is likely because novel agents have been associated with improved depth of paraprotein response in myeloma and this likely translates to higher rates of improvement in renal function.29, 30, 31, 32 RI at diagnoses has not been found to weaken the responses provided by novel agent induction therapy.33 Furthermore, unlike most conventional chemotherapeutic agents, novel agents such as bortezomib and thalidomide have safe pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties in the setting of severe RI;34 lenalidomide, even though it is mainly renally excreted, can also be safely used if appropriate dose modifications are implemented and close evaluation for toxicities are undertaken in patients with mild to moderate RI.35 Novel agents such as bortezomib have also been reported to have protective effects in the renal tubular cells36 and inhibitory effects on the pro-inflammatory and fibrotic pathways within the renal microenvironment37 in addition to its previously described anti-myeloma activity.

However, despite the survival gains experienced with the emergence of novel agents in the upfront management of MM patients with RI at diagnosis, there is still room for improvement. Acute renal failure has been a major cause of early mortality in previous observational studies involving NDMM patients.9, 38 Even in this study, we observed a 16% early mortality rate in NDMM patients with CrCl<40?ml/min treated with a novel agent induction regimen; this signifies the need for earlier and more effective interventions in this subgroup of patients.

Our study also indicated that certain patient and disease-related characteristics predicted for the presence of RI at diagnosis in NDMM patients. Age >70 years was the only patient characteristic associated with RI at diagnosis. However, higher disease burden as suggested by an international staging system 3, high-risk cytogenetics by FISH, light-chain-secreting-only disease, higher bone marrow plasma cell percentage and higher LDH were all determinants of plasma cell biology that were associated with RI at diagnosis. In contrast, only NDMM patients who did not have light-chain-secreting-only disease were most likely to recover their renal function. In this study, older age, high-risk FISH, elevated LDH, high plasma cell labeling index and lack of novel agent use during induction were independent predictors of worse OS. This suggests that RI at diagnosis may not be an adverse prognostic marker in NDMM patients. In a study by Eleftherakis-Papapiakovou et al.,19 RI was also not found to be independently associated with inferior survival likely as a result of novel agent use during induction therapy.

There are several limitations to this study. First, the etiology of RI in each patient was not included in the analyses. Given the advanced age of the average NDMM patient, it is possible that their RI can also be associated with a decline in renal function as a result of other medical comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, vascular disease, drug-induced issues and so on. unrelated to the MM. Furthermore, a renal biopsy is not necessarily required or performed in every NDMM patient with RI11 and we do not have that information on all of our patients making it difficult to know the true etiology of RI in our patient population. Second, we are unable to determine with certainty whether certain novel agents used during induction such as bortezomib is superior to immunomodulators like thalidomide or lenalidomide in this subpopulation with RI due to the potential bias in patient selection for certain therapies and the high likelihood of most patients receiving bortezomib in the salvage setting. Third, the retrospective nature of this study prevents us from truly understanding the etiology of early mortality in these patients, that is, disease-related morbidity vs therapy-related toxicity leading to early mortality. Also in patients with acute renal impairment, the traditional equations to calculate glomerular filtration rate such as the MDRD formula do not provide accurate assessments of their true CrCl.39 Nevertheless, the MDRD equation has been adopted by the IMWG in monitoring renal function and response in patients with newly diagnosed MM. 11

Data from randomized control trials comparing different induction therapy regimens in NDMM patients with RI are sparse. Nevertheless, our data confirm the improvement in renal response that novel agents have had on NDMM patients with RI. They have also decreased early mortality in these patients as well as improved OS. However, reversal of RI alone does not appear to elevate the expected OS of such NDMM patients with RI at diagnosis to that of patients without RI at diagnosis. The findings from this study imply the need for instituting early treatment strategies in order to prevent patients from developing RI. For example, redefining the existing CRAB criteria required to diagnose MM by including criteria such as free light chain ratio >100 (ref. 40) or a bone marrow plasma cell percentage of 60 or higher41 may identify NDMM patients requiring therapy prior to them developing RI. In addition, for those NDMM patients already with RI, further work is required to determine the optimal management so as to continue to reduce associated morbidity and mortality.


Dialysis: principles and treatment options - The Pharmaceutical Journal

Dialysis: principles and treatment options - The Pharmaceutical Journal

Source: dpa picture alliance / Alamy

Dialysis involves passing the patient’s blood against a semi-permeable membrane. The main options are haemodialysis (HD) pictured, using a dialysis machine and peritoneal dialysis (PD), which uses the patient’s peritoneum


Dialysis involves passing the patient’s blood against a semi-permeable membrane, with dialysis solution on the other side. It is usually started in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease. The main options are haemodialysis (HD), which is performed several times a week using a dialysis machine, and peritoneal dialysis (PD), which uses the patient’s peritoneum. Around 73% of patients in the UK starting renal replacement therapy use HD, around 19.5% use PD, and 7.4% of patients have a kidney transplant without starting dialysis.

HD and PD differ significantly in terms of risks and benefits to the patient. There are also additional requirements that need to be considered, for example whether the patient can attend an outpatient clinic and whether it is possible to create venous access via an arteriovenous fistula for patients receiving HD.

The development of renal replacement therapy (RRT) provides patients with a viable way of carrying out the role of the kidney when they have established renal failure. It was first used successfully in 1924, and became part of the management plan for patients with end-stage renal disease in the 1960s.

The main types of RRT for established renal failure are[1]:


  • Haemodialysis (HD)
  • Haemodiafiltration (HDF)
  • Peritoneal dialysis (PD)
  • Kidney transplantation

A kidney transplant is the preferred management option for patients with established renal failure. A review of the point prevalence of RRT found transplantation is the most common intervention (50% of patients), followed by HD and HDF (43% of cases) and PD in (7% of cases). HDF numbers are included within the HD prevalence due to lack of clarity of reporting from UK centres[2].

Not every patient is suitable for or wants to have a transplant, and donors may not be available. In these cases, dialysis becomes the treatment of choice, either for long-term management or until a suitable donor is found.

The incidence of patients starting dialysis in the UK is 108 per million population per year. This has remained constant since 2006 to 2012 (the latest year with data available), although improved survival rates means the number of patients receiving dialysis has increased. In 2012, 54,824 people were receiving dialysis[1], and the median age for starting dialysis was 64.6 years[2].

Currently, 73% of patients in the UK starting RRT begin with HD, 19.5% with PD and 7.4% of patients have a kidney transplant without starting dialysis[2]. Age is an important factor in determining whether to have a transplant or receive dialysis. 

There can be a survival benefit in selected elderly patients of having a transplant; however, these patients are at a higher risk of morbidity and mortality following transplant than they would be by using dialysis[3].

When is dialysis considered?

Dialysis is usually started in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4 with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of less than 15ml/min/1.73m2 and symptoms of uraemia (e.g. nausea, vomiting, weight loss, pain, acidosis, hyperkalaemia)[3]. The average eGFR reading when dialysis is started in the UK is 8.5ml/min/1.73m(ref. 2).

The threshold for starting dialysis also depends on other co-morbidities. For example, patients with chronic kidney disease and diabetes often develop uraemia with symptoms presenting earlier, leading to a higher threshold for starting dialysis. Other parameters also need to be taken into account, including the patient’s serum phosphate and bicarbonate levels and if pharmacological intervention is not sufficient.

Dialysis needs to be considered earlier in patients who are malnourished despite treatment, on account of there being a higher mortality rate among patients who start dialysis in a malnourished state because of uremic symptoms.

Patients with CKD who develop associated pulmonary oedema that is not responsive to treatment also require dialysis[3],[4].

Principles of dialysis

Dialysis involves passing the patient’s blood against a semi-permeable membrane, with dialysis solution on the other side. At this stage, three processes can occur to remove unwanted waste products.

Passive diffusion occurs when a high to low concentration gradient is present between the patient’s blood and dialysis solution (dialysate) used. Waste products in the blood diffuse into the dialysate solution while essential minerals diffuse into the blood; diffusion stops once equilibrium is achieved. The size of the molecule determines whether diffusion occurs: only low molecular weight solutes and water are able to pass through the semi-permeable membrane and therefore red blood cells are not lost[1],[5],[6].

Ultrafiltration ensures excess fluid is cleared from the body through the use of a positive (blood) or negative (dialysate) pressure gradient, moving fluid from a high to low pressure region[1],[6].

Convection allows effective clearing of larger molecules from the blood by creating a higher hydrostatic pressure in the blood (using a blood pump), leading to the passive movement of solutes dissolved in fluid. Convection relates to solutes in fluids crossing the membrane where ultrafiltration is related to movement of fluid under pressure[1],[5].

HD uses diffusion and ultrafiltration, while HDF and PD use all three processes. HDF is outside the scope of this article.

How a dialysis machine works

How a dialysis machine works

1) Blood is pumped out of a patient, often via an arteriovenous fistula
2) An anticoagulant is added to prevent the blood from clotting
3) Blood flows past the dialysate separated by a semi-permeable membrane
4) Blood is pumped back into the body


The main function of haemodialysis is to reduce the volume of uremic toxins in the blood, especially small and medium sized molecules, through diffusion. It also decreases the patient’s fluid volume via ultrafiltration and manages metabolic disturbances (e.g. maintaining the acid-base balance)[5].

This is achieved by a dialysis machine, which takes blood from the patient and pumps it towards the semi-permeable membrane. The dialysate is pumped from the opposite direction (countercurrent flow) to create a larger concentration gradient (see figure 1).

The dialysate is made up of electrolytes and water. A number of different dialysates are available to use with varying levels of electrolytes depending on the patient’s requirements.

Without dialysis, lack of kidney function will result in metabolic acidosis as the body fails to excrete excess acid and uses its serum bicarbonate to neutralise the pH. Therefore the dialysate needs to have a high bicarbonate concentration, which ensures a concentration gradient is present to allow bicarbonate to pass into the blood. Dialysis aims to move the patient from a state of mild metabolic acidosis to mild metabolic alkalosis, which prevents the acidosis from getting too severe between dialysis sessions.

Potassium needs to be removed from the blood. However, a small concentration of potassium is included in dialysates to prevent potassium being removed too quickly, minimising the risk of cardiac arrhythmias or cardiac death. The aim of potassium management during dialysis is to treat hyperkalaemia but not result in a significant hypokalaemia[5].

Glucose may also form part of the dialysate, and is particularly useful for patients with diabetes to prevent hypoglycaemia during therapy[6].

An anticoagulant is usually used to maintain patency and prevent clots within the extracorporeal circuit used in HD, which may lead to the dialyser becoming blocked[6]. It is administered through the extracorporeal circuit; the most commonly used anticoagulant is unfractionated heparin, although a number of renal units now use a low molecular weight heparin instead. If these cannot be used (e.g. the patient is at increased risk of bleeding), a continuous infusion of epoprostenol may be used, or the dialysis may be run without adding an anticoagulant; however, this increases the risk of a blockage in the system. If patients do not tolerate a heparin-based anticoagulant then alternative anticoagulants can be considered (e.g argatroban or danaparoid), or regional citrate base anticoagulation. Regional citrate base formulations result in the chelation of calcium resulting in an anticoagulant effect; this is not used commonly on account of difficulties in monitoring the effect, and the risk of hypernatraemia, metabolic alkalosis and changes in calcium ion concentration[3],[6].

Haemodialysis is usually performed in outpatient dialysis clinics. Patients attend for three sessions per week, with each session lasting three to four hours. This replaces around 10% of a normal kidney’s expected function[4],[5]. A HD session will, on average, result in the use of 120–160 litres of water to be used for the dialysate. The water must not be contaminated and is purified in most renal units through reverse osmosis[3],[4].

Nocturnal dialysis is an alternative method, with patients having their dialysis overnight for a longer period, normally six to eight hours. This has been shown to have a reduced risk of hypotension as the volume of blood is removed more slowly. There is also evidence to support it reducing hospitalisation and mortality[5].

Home HD was only being used by 1,080 patients in the UK in 2012, although this was an increase of nearly 20% from the previous year. Home HD offers the patient a greater level of freedom, reducing the burden of travel and the impact on social or work activities. Patients wanting to have home HD will require additional training to learn the required skills to carry out the process, to be stable on dialysis, have no issues with vascular access, and be independent or have a carer willing to assist with the management plan. The patient’s home will also need to have the space to hold the machine and supplies associated with HD[2].

Around one third of patients receiving HD can suffer from postdialysis fatigue where the individual can feel ‘washed out’. It can also occur during the HD session. This has been attributed to a number of different reasons, including the reduced cardiac output, depression, postdialysis hypotension, hypokalaemia and hypoglycaemia[3].

Arteriovenous fistulas

Because HD is performed three times a week, it is important the patient has a site that is easily accessible. This is obtained by creating an arteriovenous fistula (AVF), which may be radiocephalic (radial artery to cephalic vein), brachiocephalic (bracial artery to cephalic vein) or brachiobasilic (bracial artery to basilic vein). This involves some of the patient’s arterial blood going into the venous system, which leads to the vessel walls thickening and enlargement of the lumen[6].

An AVF normally takes at least six to eight weeks to form and around half will require an additional surgical procedure to ensure it functions correctly[5]. Upper forearm fistulas are generally created six months before they are used. Alternative vascular access may be required in the interim if dialysis needs to be started[5]. Generally, if a patient’s renal function is progressively declining, an AVF should be considered when the patient’s eGFR is around 20ml/min/1.73m2 , before dialysis is required[5].

A radiocephalic AVF is generally the site of choice, as it means a brachial fistula can still be used if the fistula fails (if a brachial fistula fails a radial fistula cannot be used). However, radiocephalic AVFs have a lower success rate (60%) than the brachiocephalic ones (90%)[6].

In a small number of patients, it will not be possible to use the patient’s own vasculature to create a fistula, and a synthetic graft is required. A synthetic graft involves connecting a vein and artery via a plastic tube; this technique has a higher risk of thrombosis and infection[5].

Although an AVF is not required for PD, patients at a high risk of failing on PD may have a fistula created unless a synthetic graft is required.

Peritoneal dialysis

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) can be carried out through automated PD (APD) or continual ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). The process involves introducing dialysate into the peritoneum via a permanent indwelling catheter, and using the patient’s peritoneal membrane as a semi-permeable membrane between the peritoneal blood vessels[5].

CAPD involves the patient or their carer administering up to 3l of dialysate (warmed to body temperature) into the peritoneal cavity. This volume is dependent on the patient’s body surface area; a body surface area of 1.73m2 requires around 2.5l[5],[6]. The process is carried out four to five times per day, broken down into shorter dwelling times and an overnight extended dwelling time[5]. Dialysate remains in the peritoneal cavity for up to four hours, after which it is removed via the catheter and a new bag of dialysate is added to the cavity[6]. Around 8–10l are exchanged per day through CAPD[5].

CAPD dialysate will usually contain glucose, which acts as the osmotic agent to remove excess fluid from the body[6]. As with HD, there are several different dialysates available with varying compositions of electrolytes, and the osmotic agent strength can vary from weak to strong. The osmotic strength of the dialysate can be altered to determine how much fluid removal will take place; for example, a higher concentration of glucose will provide a greater concentration gradient for fluid to be removed[6].

APD works in the same way as CAPD, but the majority of the dialysis occurs at night while the patient is sleeping through use of a programmed machine[5]. It involves on average six changes of fluid (dialysate) over a ten-hour period, all of which are carried out by the dialysis machine. It is more expensive but many patients find it allows them to carry out their normal activities with less restriction[6]. However, CAPD can be easier for the patient to learn as no machinery is required[6].

PD cannot be used indefinitely as patients will develop complications such as peritonitis. Normally, patients are able to remain on PD for up to eight years, although one fifth of individuals continue for more than ten years. Patients should be made aware that they will likely need to change the mode of dialysis at some point to HD[3].

A small number of patients receiving PD can suffer from back pain because of the large volume of fluid in the abdomen leading to poor posture. To alleviate this pain, the dialysis regimen can be altered to use less dialysate through the day as long as dialysis adequacy is not affected.

Pain can also occur when fluid is being administered into the abdomen, slowing administration rate should help in most cases but a few will still be affected. The patient may also be in pain when fluids are removed from the abdomen, this may occur in the first weeks of therapy or suggest an infection could be present[3]. Patients can also have a lowering of their appetite (due to the glucose in the dialysate) and have a sense of fullness in the abdomen due to the large fluid volumes used, which can lead to a state of malnutrition[3].


Clinicians should agree a plan with the patient commencing RRT, which is normally established when the patient is diagnosed as CKD stage 4 (eGFR of 15–30ml/min/1.73m2). However, this may not be possible in patients who present with advanced CKD and require dialysis soon after diagnosis[4]. Improved diagnosis has reduced the number of patients who present with advanced CKD and require dialysis within 90 days from 23.9% in 2006 to 19.3% in 2012[2].

It is important that the nephrology team involves the patient in the decision-making process, equipped with all the information on the advantages and disadvantages of each option, along with advice on which may be the most suitable[5].

In practice, some patients find it hard to accept their diagnosis and initially refuse dialysis treatment until their symptoms get progressively worse and they understand dialysis is required[5]. The patient can go through a multitude of feelings such as grief, denial, anger, bargaining, depression and finally acceptance of condition.

This is a common chain of events, and healthcare professionals should be aware of these stages and aim to reduce the anxiety and fear associated with starting RRT. It is also important to correct any misconceptions the patient has regarding dialysis therapy; for example, many patients believe that dialysis is a highly painful process when in fact pain is not usually experienced[5].

Patients at this stage should also have an AVF created to ensure access if dialysis is required.

Practical factors are also important to consider. These include the patient’s social background (e.g. family support, need for carers), occupation (e.g. how many hours, type), and ease and cost of transport to the local hospital[5].

Comparison of haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

All patients, if appropriate, should be given the opportunity to consider haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis as their preferred choice of dialysis. In particular, the following patient groups may benefit from PD[7]:

  • Children aged two years or younger;
  • Patients with residual renal function;
  • Adults without significant pre-existing conditions.

Data suggest there is a lower mortality risk associated with the first two years of PD therapy compared with patients receiving HD. Overall, the mortality rates in HD and PD are similar and dependent on individual factors relating to the patient’s age, past medical history and reason for kidney disease.

Patients with diabetes without significant co-morbidities and younger patients (18–44 years old) have a higher mortality rate when using HD. Risk factors for mortality associated with PD include increasing age, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, poor nutrition and low albumin levels.

Alan Green is an academic pharmacist practitioner at the University of Sunderland and Gateshead NHS Foundation Trust.


Dialysis Technology Lifts Off with Aeronautics Software - Machine Design

Patients with kidney failure depend on dialysis machines to replace most renal functions. A dialysis machine is responsible for filtering creatinine and urea from the blood, and moderating water content to control blood volume.

Now, aeronautic software will be used to significantly improve kidney dialysis technology, and no modest bioengineer can shrug off the achievement with “it’s not rocket science” because, well, that’s exactly what it is.

A team consisting of bioengineers, aeronautic engineers, circulatory specialist, and cardiovascular surgeons in the U.K. are using aerospace fluid-dynamic software to simulate blood flow for different arteriovenous-fistula (AVF) configurations. An AVF is necessary to increase blood flow from the patient’s arm to the dialysis machine.

Taking a Closer Look at Medical Inhalers

Coupling Makes Fast Connections for Medical-Oxygen Applications

Bilateral Amputee Masters Function of Two Neuroprosthetic Arms

Before dialysis, a vein and an artery in a patient’s arm are surgically connected to create an AVF, where blood flows directly from an artery into the vein, instead of passing through capillaries. The software, which caters specifically to a patient’s blood vessels, analyzes the shear flow for different artery curvatures and vein-artery alignments to create the optimal AVF configuration for that person. Pictures of the patient’s circulatory anatomy can be produced using ultrasound techniques.

Lowering Shear stress

AFV surgery can be problematic because the surgeon alters the trajectory of normal blood flow though the vessels. If the transition between the vein and artery is not smooth, eddies may develop, and the laminar flow becomes turbulent. Such an imperfection could cause shear stress on the blood cells during blood flow. Shear stress is a key instigator for blood clotting, so when AVF surgery goes wrong, it can sometimes result in a clot.

Shear stress on the blood cells during flow can also be triggered by an extreme curvature of the artery when connecting it to the vein. The blood cells hit the edge of the artery wall during flow, producing shear stress and possibly resulting in a clot. Furthermore, AFV configuration could affect oxygen transport. 

For these reasons, surgeons require a way to predict the blood flow profile in different AVF configurations. Blood flow is also different from patient to patient. “Our ultimate aim is to use computational simulation tools to design tailored, patient-specific arteriovenous-fistulae configurations that won’t block and fail,” says Peter Vincent, a senior lecturer and fellow of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) in the Department of Aeronautics at Imperial College London. 

After analyzing many different AVF configurations with the aeronautic software, the team found the optimal setup for stabilizing blood flow and reducing shear. “We discovered that if an arteriovenous fistula is formed via connection of a vein onto the outside of an arterial bend, it stabilizes the flow,” says Vincent. The process has yet to be tested clinically, but so far, it seems that rocket science and bioengineering have more in common than we thought.

To learn more, read the published report in the AIP Physics of Fluids journal. 

What is AVF surgery?

An arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is surgically created by conjoining a vein and an artery. Normally, the high pressure in arterial blood is decreased gradually as the blood flows from the single artery to small, but numerous, arterioles that branch into smaller and more numerous capillaries. (Although capillaries and arterioles have smaller cross-sectional areas, the high number of them yields a large total cross-sectional area, therefore reducing blood pressure.) From the capillaries, the blood flows into larger venules and then into a single vein, where the pressure remains relatively low.

By creating a fistula, the gradual decrease in blood pressure is replaced with direct high-pressure blood flow from the artery into the vein. Before the patient starts dialysis, he/she must wait several months for the vein to strengthen itself against the direct high pressure. This creates a strong flow from the artery to the machine, and allows the same flow rate back into the vein.

<![CDATA[.formulas {background-color:#CCFFFF; padding:10px; width:575px;} @media only screen and (max-width: 578px) { .formulas {width:95%;} } <style> ]]>


<< Start < Prev 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 Next > End >>

Page 43 of 2481
Share |
Copyright © 2015 Global Dialysis. All Rights Reserved.